mmooss 3 days ago

> internet freedom isssues

Freedom - an essential public good - is much different than using HN for lobbying for tax policy that favors YC.

You know that doing this is a big change. Why not be straightforward about it - including whose idea it is, what the parameters are, what the new policy is, etc.? If you feel you can't or feel hesitant, then you know something is wrong.

It changes the nature of HN in my mind, to something manipulative - not unlike other social media, and not unlike the trend in other businesses who embrace manipulation to greater and greater degrees.

We each have a personal responsibility to the world, as adults, to stand up for essential values. If we don't, in each of our communities, workplaces, and homes, who will? We are the only ones here; we aren't kids (not that you said we are, but to clarify the point) who can destroy things and leave it to the adults; nobody else will come in and save us.

> getting back to HN's roots

You can see a lot of companies and politicians using that - find some historical precedent and claim that is the 'roots'. There are many more roots then that.

1
dang 2 days ago

It's quite in keeping with how pg used to run HN. Since I was around back then, it doesn't feel like a big change, or any change.

I recall that there were a few people who supported things like SOPA and software patents back in those years too, but the community consensus was about as strong on those issues as it is on this.