dang 7 days ago

"Please don't post insinuations about astroturfing, shilling, bots, brigading, foreign agents and the like. It degrades discussion and is usually mistaken. If you're worried about abuse, email hn@ycombinator.com and we'll look at the data."

https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html

https://hn.algolia.com/?sort=byDate&dateRange=all&type=comme...

1
franktankbank 7 days ago

Huh, I'm not sure I said anything like the above.

dang 7 days ago

It's in the same general space, no?

If it helps at all, there's also this: "Assume good faith" - https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html

franktankbank 7 days ago

Not to belabor the point too much, but assuming good faith is different from trusting anonymous advice from people claiming to be official advocates that could do real damage to your company if legal wanted to bone you.

Yes they are a new user, but they appear to have made the account just to make that comment.

pvg 7 days ago

but they appear to have made the account just to make that comment

People making accounts so they can talk about their work is one of the best reasons for people to make an account and a big part of what makes HN threads interesting.

people claiming to be official advocates that could do real damage to your company if legal wanted to bone you.

That seems like the opposite of assuming good faith.

franktankbank 7 days ago

> People making accounts so they can talk about their work is one of the best reasons for people to make an account and a big part of what makes HN threads interesting.

Uhuh but coming in to give bad legal advice as your first comment for the benefit of the largest most litigious corp on the planet, is that what makes HN threads interesting?

> That seems like the opposite of assuming good faith.

That wasn't a statement towards the individual. That was a statement of what could befall someone who took their advice.

pvg 7 days ago

It's not legal advice. People can just be wrong and you can tell them you think that without coming off as a jerk.

That wasn't a statement towards the individual. That was a statement of what could befall someone who took their advice.

No, I don't think that's true - it's just a catastrophizing rationalization for reflexive dickishness. We all suffer from reflexive dickishness so of course it happens and it's not that big of a deal but trying to pass it off as some sort of virtue is a mistake.