> While Budman claimed that he wanted to avoid any appearance of trying to “time the market,” he appears to have done so nearly perfectly, as Backblaze’s shares crashed by as much as 26% intraday following the announcement and have continued to slide ever since.[5]
Doesn’t that seem like insider trading? I guess he can claim he didn’t know so and so was going to quit.
Not to say he’s innocent, but insiders can also trigger market crashes just by selling their stock. There are public records of substantial holdings by company insiders and while I don’t think they’re made available immediately, they are updated periodically and people can and do read into it.
That’s part of why they usually deputize a brokerage to periodically sell a fraction of their holdings at intervals.
It’s been a long while since I paid any attention to this but I do believe I saw at least a couple of instances of an insider triggering weakness in their stock just by increasing the rate of sale of their holdings.
Yeah it would have to be something like that. It seems a too obvious of a move, so I figured he might have had a solid loophole.
To wit: Bill Gates did a bunch of press before starting his foundation to make it clear that him selling MS shares was not about concerns over MS’s future but that he needed a shitload of money for other pursuits.
And Warren Buffet would use many frontmen to slowly buy shares without triggering a buying frenzy. You can’t just buy or sell 3% of a company without causing drama.
It almost certainly is. Canceling the planned sale makes it look even worse.
But… are there securities laws in this era where policy decisions are timed to pump/dump the lowest?