Selection bias on your part. There's plenty of incompetence (and outright fraud) on the other side as well.
Rememebr Michael Avenatti?
The attorney for porn actress who had an affair with a political candidate who embezzled funds to pay her off does have a certain similarity or common nexus to an attorney for key member of the presidential whack pack.
I don’t think that nexus is political, for either party. It’s all tied to one man.
This seems like both-sidesism at its worst. Michael Avenatti is one man, and he represented Stormy Daniels, who is hardly a significant figure on the left compared to Rudy Giuliani or Mike Lindell. I don't see Democrat-leaning CEOs (e.g. Howard Schultz) hiring lawyers like this. And Trump's lawyers are far worse than Biden's!
is Stormy Daniels the far left?
See, the logic is that Stormy Daniels caused Dear Leader trouble, anyone who gets in Dear Leader's way or causes him trouble is Radical Left, therefore Stormy Daniels is Radical Left.
I wonder what the effects of an echo chamber in a forum like this would be.. maybe something similar to what Reddit has become
You couldn't criticize Musk here a few years ago without the fanboys dog-piling. Same for Apple before their more recent stumbles.